"In a 17th-century law code for the Puritan colony of New Haven, Connecticut...masturbators were eligible for the death penalty.[23]"
James, Lawrence (September 15, 1997). The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-312-16985-5. The context is a discussion of the social habits of the early North American colonists.
Sort of make the TOS for Jackinchat look wimpy
Message Boards
Page: of 1
Posted on 2023-04-15 08:25 PM. Last edited by phjacker on 2023-04-15 08:35 PM. (1 edits total)
Posted on 2023-04-16 04:29 PM. Last edited by Sabonis7 on 2023-04-16 04:29 PM. (1 edits total)
Posted on 2023-04-16 04:42 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2023-04-16 04:45 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Sabonis7 said:
"In a 17th-century law code for the Puritan colony of New Haven, Connecticut...masturbators were eligible for the death penalty.[23]"
James, Lawrence (September 15, 1997). The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-312-16985-5. The context is a discussion of the social habits of the early North American colonists.
Sort of make the TOS for Jackinchat look wimpy
"In a 17th-century law code for the Puritan colony of New Haven, Connecticut...masturbators were eligible for the death penalty.[23]"
James, Lawrence (September 15, 1997). The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-312-16985-5. The context is a discussion of the social habits of the early North American colonists.
Sort of make the TOS for Jackinchat look wimpy
Yes, but was it a deterrent? Or were there people standing at the site of execution holding lighted candles and singing John Lennon songs?
Sabonis7 said:
"In a 17th-century law code for the Puritan colony of New Haven, Connecticut...masturbators were eligible for the death penalty.[23]"
James, Lawrence (September 15, 1997). The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-312-16985-5. The context is a discussion of the social habits of the early North American colonists.
Sort of make the TOS for Jackinchat look wimpy
"In a 17th-century law code for the Puritan colony of New Haven, Connecticut...masturbators were eligible for the death penalty.[23]"
James, Lawrence (September 15, 1997). The Rise and Fall of the British Empire. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-312-16985-5. The context is a discussion of the social habits of the early North American colonists.
Sort of make the TOS for Jackinchat look wimpy
And the way your nut-job religious right are going, it will be the law again soon!
Massive wanker. I would punctuate properly, but Jackinchat wont let me
Quick way to wipe out the population. So once everyone is executed, who executes the executioner?
I was in a hospital and being prepped for open heart surgegy anyway they had a lot of hot nurses and on a night I felt horney I desided to J/O so I did but I forgot about the batteryoperated heart monitor in my pocket and I later guessed that the Gals in the n urses station got a kick out of knowing what I had done.
old long time jacker who loves anal with woman only
As a kid I was raised a Catholic and I always remember lectures about impure thoughts or deeds. I did not know what they were until in my early teens, but by that timme I was well into jerking off and did not worry about going to hell.
old long time jacker who loves anal with woman only
RobBanks said:
Yes, but was it a deterrent? Or were there people standing at the site of execution holding lighted candles and singing John Lennon songs?
Yes, but was it a deterrent? Or were there people standing at the site of execution holding lighted candles and singing John Lennon songs?
"Come Together"
Posted on 2023-05-02 05:43 AM. Last edited by Sabonis7 on 2023-05-02 05:43 AM. (1 edits total)
"In 1568 Montgomery Highway v. City of Hoover, the Supreme Court of Alabama this week upheld the constitutionality of an Alabama statute prohibiting the sale of "any device designed ... primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs." The law was targeted primarily at the sale of such objects as vibrators and dildos." (in 2009)
I guess if you're going to do it down there, you're going to have to do it the old-fashioned way.
I guess if you're going to do it down there, you're going to have to do it the old-fashioned way.
Page: of 1