They are. It amazes me just how often I see guys on here actually objecting to certain women being posted just because they personally don't find them attractive.

And yeah, that's absolutely ridiculous. Its a small step from that, to saying finding anyone attractive is pedophilic, seeing as they were once children.

In my case it's born of frustration. I like SOME uk morning TV girls. I open the thread and it's saturated with posts about the same few who, in my opinion, are not attractive at all. I try to post about the younger (under 50!) ones and it goes nowhere. Certain tastes dictate it and they baffle me. That's all. Plus it's a forum, IE, a place you can offer your opinion for discussion. It's OK to disagree with each other.

As for the second part. As someone who masturbates to Dafne Keen and Millie Bobby Brown, I'd obviously fall under other posters' suspicions! But the last time I checked they're 18 and 21 respectively.

Only Maisie of them for me and I never watched GOT she just has incredible feet.

Despite the fact plenty are older than us or same age so even if you had a crush as a kid (I did on Ricci) it doesn't mean we still fancy the kid version. It's very strange.

Greta, that's a new one on me! I also have a thing for Hailee Steinfeld and Chloe Grace Moretz (following your point about Emma, Chloe's now 26 I think) so I guess I must come under suspicion by our friends.

I never cared for Taylor Swift

.

Same. She's okay but never really did it for me.

Jennifer Aniston, no good explanation for why. I am sure she is a lovely person.

Also never understood the love for Emma Watson or Carol Vorderman. But also just in general I've never seen the appeal of "celebs" anyway. Yes, some of them are attractive, but when it comes to "personal time" there are much more attractive, and much more naked, women all over the internet. A celebrity would have to be seriously something special for me to want to choose some tabloid red carpet photographs, or some zoom lens bikini paparazzi shots, in my moment of need, when I can just look up some qaulity porn.

As another example of the mindset of some people, i reacted to this pic on thefappeningblog by saying it was hot.



And i got this reply very quickly afterwards.




The posts have been deleted and I've not included the username. Now tell me this makes sense.

I don't have a problem with offering an opinion, it's the getting narky at other members for posting women deemed unattractive to the person complaining, that I find totally unnecessary. I've given my opinion before on certain women that are unattractive to me, but I'd never get annoyed by anyone posting those women, or at them for doing so. For example, if I post say Sally Bundock, and someone says she's not their cup of tea, that's absolutely fine. But getting a bee in your bonnet about it, and acting as if I shouldn't be posting her is quite another entirely. And I believe that's what Churchill was getting at about the topic being divisive. If people could just say "I don't find so-and-so attractive" and left it at that, there'd be no problem. Disrespecting others' opinion is what's unwarranted.

Seems like the UK dudes are super hung up on celebs. Id much rather jerk to regular everyday babes. Plenty that are way hotter than most celebs out there
.

That seems like a sweeping generalisation....also, I don't get why this has to be an either/or kind of thing. I do wank a lot over telly/music babes, but also a lot over regular, everyday babes too. I dont have a preference for one over the other. If I find a woman sexually stimulating, that's my sole criteria for wanting to pull my dick out to her. Her fame, or lack of it, is not a factor in that for me. And again, what qualifies as "hot" is totally subjective. There's plenty of celebs who do absolutely nothing for me, and that also applies to regular women too.

Yeah I?ll stroke my dick to anyone