I cant find the link, but it was from a tumblr which got its images from www.reddit.com/r/realgirls
The girl in it was without a doubt 18, and it had a watermark on the image!!
WTF?
Message Boards
Page: of 1
Sorry to hear that, man. Seems a few people on here are on a crusade (however noble the intention may be). Banning someone when the proof seems to go their way or at least without confronting them first is a cowardly, dickhead move. I hope you can sort this out easily and get back to where you were before it happened, horny19.
Actually, you were banned for requesting to talk about having sex with your step-mom.
Two things I like hot and fresh in the morning; coffee and porn
The problem with sharing porn that you find on the Internet is that it is eaither from a reputable studio in which case, while the studio will hold the necessary records to show that those who appear in it are old enough and consenting, you are infinging the studio's copyright, or its provenance is unknown, in which case who can prove the people in it are old enough and were willing participants?
In the former case studios can't possibly spend their days searching the net for infringements and almost certainly turn a blind eye to very small excerpt from their portfolio, especially if they are watermarked so as to direct people back to the stdio's site for more of the same, but in cases where large amounts have been nicked they may well ask for the material to removed. People who run web sites and forums may also be alive to copyright violations and act before the copyright owner complains.
In the former case studios can't possibly spend their days searching the net for infringements and almost certainly turn a blind eye to very small excerpt from their portfolio, especially if they are watermarked so as to direct people back to the stdio's site for more of the same, but in cases where large amounts have been nicked they may well ask for the material to removed. People who run web sites and forums may also be alive to copyright violations and act before the copyright owner complains.
Yea the incest stuff... is a sure fire way to get the boot here.
its just sex
that sucks, guess I will think twice
I do love getting jackMail so turn me on....
[quote=coffeenporn]Actually, you were banned for requesting to talk about having sex with your step-mom.[/quote
Since when has 'step' been incest???WTF
Since when has 'step' been incest???WTF
[quote=coffeenporn]Actually, you were banned for requesting to talk about having sex with your step-mom.[/quote
Since when has 'step' been incest???WTF
Since when has 'step' been incest???WTF
Um, what.
You might want to check that again, I never even said a word in chat! Was only posting images.
Not only that, but when have I ever said that in chat? I dont even have a step mom lol.
You might want to check that again, I never even said a word in chat! Was only posting images.
Not only that, but when have I ever said that in chat? I dont even have a step mom lol.
horny19cur said:
Um, what.
You might want to check that again, I never even said a word in chat! Was only posting images.
Not only that, but when have I ever said that in chat? I dont even have a step mom lol.
Um, what.
You might want to check that again, I never even said a word in chat! Was only posting images.
Not only that, but when have I ever said that in chat? I dont even have a step mom lol.
Why make a thread about this, instead pm coffeeandporn and handle this directly.
Couldn't find his username before i made the thread. PM'd him now.
Coffeenporn comes from xxxchatters (where you can literally be banned for not responding to an unwanted, unnecessary and un-asked-for pm from a mod) and used to do a ridiculous amount of tone-policing and backseat moderating there, warranted or not; when he wasn't sucking up to their mods, that is. From the moment he showed up on JC he started doing the exact same thing, especially when Rod was around, so it's no wonder they made him a mod, unfortunately.
Not that a lot weren't warrented, but that's often common practice at xxxchatters; kick/ban first, make up a reason later. Curious enough to ask why someone was kicked/banned for clealy not doing what was said they did? You get kicked/banned too.
Also, since he is from xxxchatters, I'm sure he'll get them to implement the policy of reading our pm's and limiting what we can say at some point, as well.
Time to look for a new chat room, I guess. It's been a fun 8 years.
aaronbi33 said:
Banning someone when the proof seems to go their way or at least without confronting them first is a cowardly, dickhead move.
Banning someone when the proof seems to go their way or at least without confronting them first is a cowardly, dickhead move.
Not that a lot weren't warrented, but that's often common practice at xxxchatters; kick/ban first, make up a reason later. Curious enough to ask why someone was kicked/banned for clealy not doing what was said they did? You get kicked/banned too.
Also, since he is from xxxchatters, I'm sure he'll get them to implement the policy of reading our pm's and limiting what we can say at some point, as well.
Time to look for a new chat room, I guess. It's been a fun 8 years.
Page: of 1