Message Boards
Page: of 3 next >
I'd like to know what white men think of interracial porn with white girls and black men together and seeing beautiful white girls in public with black men. It's in white guy's faces so much nowadays i want to know their honest thoughts on it-do you stroke to it,does it make you jealous,angry,happy or excited? What are your past experiences with girls you've liked who have been with black guys,did it crush your self-esteem? Any pics you like on the subject? It's an interesting sexual fetish that isn't really acknowledged in mainstream so it will be interesting to see responses!
Nothing about a black man with a white girl or guy bothers me. I rather enjoy watching a black guy a lot. I lived with a guy from Jamacia for a few years. Never got to see much on the sexy side, dammit! It's all good these days.
skin color doesnt mean anything to me in terms of porn or couples in public honestly
also have had gfs who had been with black guys and it meant nothing to my self esteem lol
also have had gfs who had been with black guys and it meant nothing to my self esteem lol
feel free to pm
Unregistered 
younghungbull said:
skin color doesnt mean anything
skin color doesnt mean anything
I'm totally okay with interracial stuff. That being said I don't seek out that kind of porn but, if I was talking to someone and they wanted to show me some interracial stuff I wouldn't be turned off by it.
porn is porn.
im perfectly ok with it. im 22 white and im fucking a black girl and she tells me stories of monster black cocks. kinda hot she likes my cock better
Unregistered
The vast majority of men who watch interracial are white so clearly it does something for them. Deep down we're all racist and we're all jealous of bigger guys. If anything I'm more curious about what black guys think of interracial. Do they like the thought of being the "bull" or do they just find it absurd?
I am a white guy with a large penis. I wouldn't mind any of the interracial relationships/sex/porn except that it's created this stereotype that I'm more likely to have a small penis because of the color of my skin. I feel like girls at the club seek out black guys thinking they have bigger dicks, and don't give me as much of a shot. That being said, I still manage to get laid several times a week, so I probably shouldn't complain.
I've sometimes watch interracial porn, but frankly it doesn't seem weird to me. I've had sex with black girls, so why shouldn't white girls have sex with black guys.
I've sometimes watch interracial porn, but frankly it doesn't seem weird to me. I've had sex with black girls, so why shouldn't white girls have sex with black guys.
I love interracial porn. Watching white cunts get stretched to the max makes cum hard
Unregistered
Im a white male here and I love interracial gay porn. Nothing hotter then seeing a big black cock destroying a white boys manpussy. Especailly bareback and filling up the white boys ass with hot cum.
Also seeing a older milf with getting ripped up by a muscle BBC bareback is hot too.
I definitely jack off to both. More so the gay porn
As far as seeing them in public or anything like that has never ever bothered me.
I have an 8 inch cut cock so the size thing never was an issue for me
Also seeing a older milf with getting ripped up by a muscle BBC bareback is hot too.
I definitely jack off to both. More so the gay porn
As far as seeing them in public or anything like that has never ever bothered me.
I have an 8 inch cut cock so the size thing never was an issue for me
Unregistered
Interracial either way doesn't bother me. Having a big cock myself, I love watching the cuckold vids. Makes me feel great about having a big cock.
I also find many black girls attractive. Anya Ivy is one of my favourites, she makes my cock go wild.
I also find many black girls attractive. Anya Ivy is one of my favourites, she makes my cock go wild.
Chicks are great - regardless of race or colour !
dks - your inbox is full, so I can't send message
Masturbating to porn & cams
It's not politically correct to say one doesn't like interracial. We all like to think of ourselves as tolerant and open-minded, don't we? And we can't be that if we're down on interracial, if we say anything but, Hey, man, like, you know, what does skin color really matter?
One thing I don't like about interracial is the stereoptyped concept of so much of it: Naughty White girl can't be satisfied by her -- predictably -- small White man. It's stereotypical from the jump, but then stereotyping Whites doesn't bring opprobrium; what brings opprobrium is not being "tolerant" or "broad-minded" and expressing a negative stance toward interracial.
It is a matter of personal likes and dislikes, of taste, as to what one finds attractive, beautiful, or sexy. It's my personal taste that very often blacks, both male and female, manifest to me a simian quality that is unattractive. With this simian quality, interracial verges on the bestial.
But, then, perhaps that is the attraction for some, the bestiality of it. If that is the case that some find interracial porn erotic because of the bestiality of it, is that not what some of you would define as racism? Is it racist to be attracted to something simply based on skin color just as it is to be repelled by someone simply based on skin color? Isn't that what racism is, making judgments based solely on skin color?
Lastly, a reason I have for disliking interracial is that it reeks of defilement. And trendy it appears to be to have White defilement pushed into our faces. Whether we like it or not, the way to make more Whites is two Whites, male and female, having sex to conception. Any other permutation results in what is popularly called today "mixed race" or "biracial," what used to be called more accurately and descriptively "mulatto," "quadroon," and "octoroon." And any person who is right with himself wants to see his kind flourish in numbers. There are groups that are bound together by race for their own advancement. Blacks have the NAACP and SCLC, the Urban League. Hispanics have their LaRaza and MeCHa. Arguably a race, Jews have their Anti-Defamation League, JINSA, and AIPAC to advocate for their interests. But it is only Whites who seem to lack the will or, if they even go so far as having the will, the fortitude to withstand the sneers and complaints of those who would say, as late columnist William Raspberry once wrote, Whites should never be allowed to organize for anything.
If all other races can advocate for their perpetuation, I do wish that I could advocate for mine without ridicule or rancor. And White women having sex with not-White men is not the pathway to perpetuation.
Apologies if I appear to ramble and sound disjointed. I wrote this, however, rather stream of consciousness, which doesn't lend itself to streamlined thought. It is a complex subject, though, perhaps or surely too complex for a forum like this.
One thing I don't like about interracial is the stereoptyped concept of so much of it: Naughty White girl can't be satisfied by her -- predictably -- small White man. It's stereotypical from the jump, but then stereotyping Whites doesn't bring opprobrium; what brings opprobrium is not being "tolerant" or "broad-minded" and expressing a negative stance toward interracial.
It is a matter of personal likes and dislikes, of taste, as to what one finds attractive, beautiful, or sexy. It's my personal taste that very often blacks, both male and female, manifest to me a simian quality that is unattractive. With this simian quality, interracial verges on the bestial.
But, then, perhaps that is the attraction for some, the bestiality of it. If that is the case that some find interracial porn erotic because of the bestiality of it, is that not what some of you would define as racism? Is it racist to be attracted to something simply based on skin color just as it is to be repelled by someone simply based on skin color? Isn't that what racism is, making judgments based solely on skin color?
Lastly, a reason I have for disliking interracial is that it reeks of defilement. And trendy it appears to be to have White defilement pushed into our faces. Whether we like it or not, the way to make more Whites is two Whites, male and female, having sex to conception. Any other permutation results in what is popularly called today "mixed race" or "biracial," what used to be called more accurately and descriptively "mulatto," "quadroon," and "octoroon." And any person who is right with himself wants to see his kind flourish in numbers. There are groups that are bound together by race for their own advancement. Blacks have the NAACP and SCLC, the Urban League. Hispanics have their LaRaza and MeCHa. Arguably a race, Jews have their Anti-Defamation League, JINSA, and AIPAC to advocate for their interests. But it is only Whites who seem to lack the will or, if they even go so far as having the will, the fortitude to withstand the sneers and complaints of those who would say, as late columnist William Raspberry once wrote, Whites should never be allowed to organize for anything.
If all other races can advocate for their perpetuation, I do wish that I could advocate for mine without ridicule or rancor. And White women having sex with not-White men is not the pathway to perpetuation.
Apologies if I appear to ramble and sound disjointed. I wrote this, however, rather stream of consciousness, which doesn't lend itself to streamlined thought. It is a complex subject, though, perhaps or surely too complex for a forum like this.
Some brainiac called me "Brainiac."
Unregistered
Sithon said:
It's not politically correct to say one doesn't like interracial. We all like to think of ourselves as tolerant and open-minded, don't we? And we can't be that if we're down on interracial, if we say anything but, Hey, man, like, you know, what does skin color really matter?
One thing I don't like about interracial is the stereoptyped concept of so much of it: Naughty White girl can't be satisfied by her -- predictably -- small White man. It's stereotypical from the jump, but then stereotyping Whites doesn't bring opprobrium; what brings opprobrium is not being "tolerant" or "broad-minded" and expressing a negative stance toward interracial.
It is a matter of personal likes and dislikes, of taste, as to what one finds attractive, beautiful, or sexy. It's my personal taste that very often blacks, both male and female, manifest to me a simian quality that is unattractive. With this simian quality, interracial verges on the bestial.
But, then, perhaps that is the attraction for some, the bestiality of it. If that is the case that some find interracial porn erotic because of the bestiality of it, is that not what some of you would define as racism? Is it racist to be attracted to something simply based on skin color just as it is to be repelled by someone simply based on skin color? Isn't that what racism is, making judgments based solely on skin color?
Lastly, a reason I have for disliking interracial is that it reeks of defilement. And trendy it appears to be to have White defilement pushed into our faces. Whether we like it or not, the way to make more Whites is two Whites, male and female, having sex to conception. Any other permutation results in what is popularly called today "mixed race" or "biracial," what used to be called more accurately and descriptively "mulatto," "quadroon," and "octoroon." And any person who is right with himself wants to see his kind flourish in numbers. There are groups that are bound together by race for their own advancement. Blacks have the NAACP and SCLC, the Urban League. Hispanics have their LaRaza and MeCHa. Arguably a race, Jews have their Anti-Defamation League, JINSA, and AIPAC to advocate for their interests. But it is only Whites who seem to lack the will or, if they even go so far as having the will, the fortitude to withstand the sneers and complaints of those who would say, as late columnist William Raspberry once wrote, Whites should never be allowed to organize for anything.
If all other races can advocate for their perpetuation, I do wish that I could advocate for mine without ridicule or rancor. And White women having sex with not-White men is not the pathway to perpetuation.
Apologies if I appear to ramble and sound disjointed. I wrote this, however, rather stream of consciousness, which doesn't lend itself to streamlined thought. It is a complex subject, though, perhaps or surely too complex for a forum like this.
It's not politically correct to say one doesn't like interracial. We all like to think of ourselves as tolerant and open-minded, don't we? And we can't be that if we're down on interracial, if we say anything but, Hey, man, like, you know, what does skin color really matter?
One thing I don't like about interracial is the stereoptyped concept of so much of it: Naughty White girl can't be satisfied by her -- predictably -- small White man. It's stereotypical from the jump, but then stereotyping Whites doesn't bring opprobrium; what brings opprobrium is not being "tolerant" or "broad-minded" and expressing a negative stance toward interracial.
It is a matter of personal likes and dislikes, of taste, as to what one finds attractive, beautiful, or sexy. It's my personal taste that very often blacks, both male and female, manifest to me a simian quality that is unattractive. With this simian quality, interracial verges on the bestial.
But, then, perhaps that is the attraction for some, the bestiality of it. If that is the case that some find interracial porn erotic because of the bestiality of it, is that not what some of you would define as racism? Is it racist to be attracted to something simply based on skin color just as it is to be repelled by someone simply based on skin color? Isn't that what racism is, making judgments based solely on skin color?
Lastly, a reason I have for disliking interracial is that it reeks of defilement. And trendy it appears to be to have White defilement pushed into our faces. Whether we like it or not, the way to make more Whites is two Whites, male and female, having sex to conception. Any other permutation results in what is popularly called today "mixed race" or "biracial," what used to be called more accurately and descriptively "mulatto," "quadroon," and "octoroon." And any person who is right with himself wants to see his kind flourish in numbers. There are groups that are bound together by race for their own advancement. Blacks have the NAACP and SCLC, the Urban League. Hispanics have their LaRaza and MeCHa. Arguably a race, Jews have their Anti-Defamation League, JINSA, and AIPAC to advocate for their interests. But it is only Whites who seem to lack the will or, if they even go so far as having the will, the fortitude to withstand the sneers and complaints of those who would say, as late columnist William Raspberry once wrote, Whites should never be allowed to organize for anything.
If all other races can advocate for their perpetuation, I do wish that I could advocate for mine without ridicule or rancor. And White women having sex with not-White men is not the pathway to perpetuation.
Apologies if I appear to ramble and sound disjointed. I wrote this, however, rather stream of consciousness, which doesn't lend itself to streamlined thought. It is a complex subject, though, perhaps or surely too complex for a forum like this.
what a braniac
Unregistered
Sithon said:
It's not politically correct to say one doesn't like interracial. We all like to think of ourselves as tolerant and open-minded, don't we? And we can't be that if we're down on interracial, if we say anything but, Hey, man, like, you know, what does skin color really matter?
One thing I don't like about interracial is the stereoptyped concept of so much of it: Naughty White girl can't be satisfied by her -- predictably -- small White man. It's stereotypical from the jump, but then stereotyping Whites doesn't bring opprobrium; what brings opprobrium is not being "tolerant" or "broad-minded" and expressing a negative stance toward interracial.
It is a matter of personal likes and dislikes, of taste, as to what one finds attractive, beautiful, or sexy. It's my personal taste that very often blacks, both male and female, manifest to me a simian quality that is unattractive. With this simian quality, interracial verges on the bestial.
But, then, perhaps that is the attraction for some, the bestiality of it. If that is the case that some find interracial porn erotic because of the bestiality of it, is that not what some of you would define as racism? Is it racist to be attracted to something simply based on skin color just as it is to be repelled by someone simply based on skin color? Isn't that what racism is, making judgments based solely on skin color?
Lastly, a reason I have for disliking interracial is that it reeks of defilement. And trendy it appears to be to have White defilement pushed into our faces. Whether we like it or not, the way to make more Whites is two Whites, male and female, having sex to conception. Any other permutation results in what is popularly called today "mixed race" or "biracial," what used to be called more accurately and descriptively "mulatto," "quadroon," and "octoroon." And any person who is right with himself wants to see his kind flourish in numbers. There are groups that are bound together by race for their own advancement. Blacks have the NAACP and SCLC, the Urban League. Hispanics have their LaRaza and MeCHa. Arguably a race, Jews have their Anti-Defamation League, JINSA, and AIPAC to advocate for their interests. But it is only Whites who seem to lack the will or, if they even go so far as having the will, the fortitude to withstand the sneers and complaints of those who would say, as late columnist William Raspberry once wrote, Whites should never be allowed to organize for anything.
If all other races can advocate for their perpetuation, I do wish that I could advocate for mine without ridicule or rancor. And White women having sex with not-White men is not the pathway to perpetuation.
Apologies if I appear to ramble and sound disjointed. I wrote this, however, rather stream of consciousness, which doesn't lend itself to streamlined thought. It is a complex subject, though, perhaps or surely too complex for a forum like this.
Are you Calvin Candie?It's not politically correct to say one doesn't like interracial. We all like to think of ourselves as tolerant and open-minded, don't we? And we can't be that if we're down on interracial, if we say anything but, Hey, man, like, you know, what does skin color really matter?
One thing I don't like about interracial is the stereoptyped concept of so much of it: Naughty White girl can't be satisfied by her -- predictably -- small White man. It's stereotypical from the jump, but then stereotyping Whites doesn't bring opprobrium; what brings opprobrium is not being "tolerant" or "broad-minded" and expressing a negative stance toward interracial.
It is a matter of personal likes and dislikes, of taste, as to what one finds attractive, beautiful, or sexy. It's my personal taste that very often blacks, both male and female, manifest to me a simian quality that is unattractive. With this simian quality, interracial verges on the bestial.
But, then, perhaps that is the attraction for some, the bestiality of it. If that is the case that some find interracial porn erotic because of the bestiality of it, is that not what some of you would define as racism? Is it racist to be attracted to something simply based on skin color just as it is to be repelled by someone simply based on skin color? Isn't that what racism is, making judgments based solely on skin color?
Lastly, a reason I have for disliking interracial is that it reeks of defilement. And trendy it appears to be to have White defilement pushed into our faces. Whether we like it or not, the way to make more Whites is two Whites, male and female, having sex to conception. Any other permutation results in what is popularly called today "mixed race" or "biracial," what used to be called more accurately and descriptively "mulatto," "quadroon," and "octoroon." And any person who is right with himself wants to see his kind flourish in numbers. There are groups that are bound together by race for their own advancement. Blacks have the NAACP and SCLC, the Urban League. Hispanics have their LaRaza and MeCHa. Arguably a race, Jews have their Anti-Defamation League, JINSA, and AIPAC to advocate for their interests. But it is only Whites who seem to lack the will or, if they even go so far as having the will, the fortitude to withstand the sneers and complaints of those who would say, as late columnist William Raspberry once wrote, Whites should never be allowed to organize for anything.
If all other races can advocate for their perpetuation, I do wish that I could advocate for mine without ridicule or rancor. And White women having sex with not-White men is not the pathway to perpetuation.
Apologies if I appear to ramble and sound disjointed. I wrote this, however, rather stream of consciousness, which doesn't lend itself to streamlined thought. It is a complex subject, though, perhaps or surely too complex for a forum like this.
Page: of 3 next >