Why did you have to mention cumonprintedpics.com?
Unless you want perverts to visit the site.

Have to agree with this.

I look at teens. ONLY NN. I like them developed and in the upper age range. Have zero desire to see them nude. just not into that. I doubt that makes me a "predator".
Not to sound like a hypocrite but, i will agree that anyone who is into pre-teen or anything close to that, is sick. Ill just never understand that.

So, if you don't understand it, it's "sick?" I don't understand homosexuality, I think anal sex is disgusting. As such, those things are all "sick?"

You,re right, maybe sick was a bad term to use. My apologies. Its just something i cant understand, the attraction to. Just like s&m pis scat and all the other things some people find a turn on. to each his own.

It's tricky. The first thought is revulsion, but honestly I am just glad that this is not something that turns me on at all. I see the poor bastards in the chatrooms who have liltreats in the rooms they're in and think 'there but for the grace of god'.

I feel the same way about homosexuals.

You're an idiot. I've never even looked at a girl under 11 in real life with any intention other than pure. Much less thought sexually about them.

But because I find under 18 aged teens to be capable of being sexy visually, find the images found on the internet (perfectly legal NN) enticing; but haven't done anything illegal with those desires, nor would I, in your view I'm still automatically a pedophile to you, and a predator? That's insane. I'm not making any excuses for your insanity

You need therapy if you can't understand that pedophile literally can only apply to finding 11yo and under attractive (exclusively), for starters. And legally you need to collect or elicit CP from a minor, attempt to/or groom one, or outright molest one to be labeled it. And also, that looking is not a crime. Thinking is not a crime -- Are you using stupid slippery slope logic to defend your silly position?

I'm glad I live in a world where I can look at CG imagery, that ageplay porn exists, NN teens, read erotica that sparks my imagination. You can sit there and be a delusional tool casting blind, patently incorrect labels around... if you wanna come at me, with your silly condemnation, use the correct term hebephile. Wait.. I'm not exclusively into that age range! I'm just attracted to those capable of a sexuality. So I'd do a 70yo if I found her attractive. I'd do a 40yo if I found her attractive. I'd do a 25yo if I found her attractive. I'd do a teen (of age) if I found her attractive.

And with that last, you have definitively violated the site's Terms of Service.

Bye.

I just worry that any thread that posts anything like this is actually a euphemism for something that is very much illegal. I'm always glad to see the mods here take off anything illegal. It should be very clear to everyone, shouldn't it, that it is illegal to post anything sexual that concerns someone under 18, and illegal to post pictures that aren't in the public domain and aren't posted with the consent of the person concerned?