GraysAnatomy said:
Vintage guys.
. 
. 
. 
. 
Vintage guys.
. . . . very nice! and from tumblr? I thought they'd have removed everything by now... makes me think I should go try to salvage some of old collection
Message Boards
very nice! and from tumblr? I thought they'd have removed everything by now... makes me think I should go try to salvage some of old collection
How did you get my picture?
A Ginger of yore!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
This picture could have been taken of my buddy and me 60 years ago.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
If I am here it is in my hand
Awesome pictures, oldjim!
Here are some more.
. 
. 
Here are some more.
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Thx Grays. Loving yours also
If I am here it is in my hand
More.
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Oldies but goodies.
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
That was like me and my buddy - he was always looking ahead at the magazine or video...
I was always more excited to be watching him...
GraysAnatomy said:
This picture could have been taken of my buddy and me 60 years ago.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
This picture could have been taken of my buddy and me 60 years ago.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The way it was in the full bush days!
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Unregistered 
Some things never change.
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
The way it was.
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .