JackinChat forums are temporarily in read-only mode. Will be back soon!
Search Posts
Search Criteria
in

Filter (Optional):


From: Pornography IS Legal in Utah by Kent

moosegod said:
hate to break it to you, that's a fake site... cbsnews.com doesn't have a .co URL


I'll adjust the post immediately.

From: Pornography IS Legal in Utah by Kent

Jackinchat members in Utah should be aware that this story is fake.

http://cbsnews.com.co/utah-makes-porn-illegal-fines-30-days-jail/

Right wing Utah Republicans are crazy enough though that this does seem plausible.

From: Anyone Remember BraTeaseBoard? by Kent

Roger said:
"GENT" Bra Covers

User posted image

User posted image



The big group of titty mag covers is great. I missed the days that "Gent" was on the magazine racks, but lots of them show up on Ebay. Awesome boobs and bras here. These two are great. Holding it after taking it off, and the big underwire bra with lace fabric cups. It's hot to be making out, and you get a chance to feel up the lace and the stitching in cups like that under a blouse. Most bras have featureless molded cups now.

From: Anyone Remember BraTeaseBoard? by Kent

Roger said:

........................Pretty good masturbation material if you have a women's underwear fetish and may sometimes ask a sex partner to "leave it on." wink But it was a niche interest as "adult" websites go I guess.



And your sex partner who knows you so well, knows exactly what "IT" is that you want left on for bed.....LOL.

Thanks for the information Roger, and the pictures. I pulled hundreds of bra pictures off the site, but got there sort of late in its run. So I didn't know the details.

From: Anyone Remember BraTeaseBoard? by Kent

A thread about the disappearance of Dick.Net brought to mind BraTeaseBoard.Com. It was a bra fetish website that disappeared a few years ago. It was never very active, but it had a loyal following who regularly posted high quality pictures of women in bras. Great for guys who liked bras.....REALLY liked bras......as in a bra fetish.......and curvy women who fill them. BraTeaseBoard had some really nice ultra soft core "porn" ( with no bare breasts or nudity allowed.)

As is so often the case, it just disappeared without a word of warning or explanation. The people who own websites often make a big deal of promoting "membership" (because it's the members who provide the free content), but when the owner decides to close up shop, the members are as disposable as the domain name.

From: Huge Cocks by Kent

SloStroker said:
Me too. I hate having a little dick.


Great dick pics!

I heard a guy call his little one a sex balloon. Works for me! Got a small softie, but a decent sized sex balloon.

Guys with big long soft swingers are amazing to look at.

From: Jockstraps! by Kent

GraysAnatomy said:
Hot guys and jockstraps!

User posted image User posted image User posted image


Not sure they make straps big enough to hold those guys.

From: Trans bathrooms by Kent

mexicojo said:
I don't think it was for his views - you are absolutely right that all views should be welcomed, even if hard to take a times- No, Kent - he was abusive to others here, I saw a post where he was making fun of a gay guy and his name - and he and i had heated exchanges, which were fine - but then he started messaging me and threatening me. He truly is not what this site is about...anyway - have a good evening.


Thanks for the clarification on that Mexicojo. That kind of overt personal hostility and threatening attitude toward other members is never acceptable.

From: Trans bathrooms by Kent

I'm sorry to see that Dman has been suspended. I hope it was for genuine impropriety in his dealings with other members, and not for his outspoken comments on the boards. Yes, he was a pain in the ass and would shoot off private messages, but he had a right to his right wing politics for example, and at his worst appeared no more inappropriate and impolite in his postings than the public utterances of the presumptive presidential nominee of the Republican party.

It seems to me not long ago that Dman was in a rage about improper treatment of women and demanding the expulsion of Jackinchat members he was sure were perverts and pedophiles. I hated his grandstanding, but I thought he was solidly on the side of the angels there in a way that would never piss off a moderator. You never know I guess.

Of course Dman can always modify his public and private persona a bit, gin up a new screen name with another Email address, open a new Jackinchat account, and he'll be good to go again.

From: Trans bathrooms by Kent

@ mexicojo: Thanks for the comment. It's amusing to be at a place in which BOTH of the gender-specific restrooms have a capacity of ONE person with a lock on the door and single toilet and wash stand. Both identical and both with a lock.

I was alone in a restroom washing my hands at the sink when a woman strolled in. Seeing the mistake she had made caused her to literally YELP in horror, and then turn around and hit the door so hard that I was afraid she might have hurt herself. Of course the appropriate response would have been to simply say "excuse me" and leave. But instead, she lost her mind. Amazing!

From: Trans bathrooms by Kent

pmont said:
.......They are making it out like these people are rapists and pedophiles and will rape anything that walks in...

We have "gender neutral" bathrooms here in Ontario by law.....

And guess what...God didn't smite Ontario.

It amazes me what some people get upset about.


Welcome to the wild and crazy world of right wing Republican politics and the religion-based fanaticism of the culture wars.

Of course this so-called restroom "issue" is all about labeling LGBT people as perverts. The radicals are all pissed off about same-sex marriage becoming a constitutional right, so they are going to fight the LGBT people any way they can. Effectively branding them as perverts is straight out of the right wing political playbook.

There are gender-neutral restrooms here in the States too. There would in fact be no reason to have gender-specific restrooms if you would dispense with the idiocy of open male urinals and make a few other simple accommodations for privacy.

Here is an article from late last year after Houston voters defeated a broad equal rights ordinance. It was defeated by a campaign in which the opposition ran ads "depicting a man preying on a young girl in a women's restroom."

Yep. raising the specter of LGBT people as perverts and sex criminals is just about the only weapon in the right wing arsenal.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/katherine-ripley/bathrooms-segregated-_b_8524374.html

Our friends in Canada should know that not all Americans are crazy. It's mostly just the right wing Republicans. Who are BTW getting ready to nominate the very poster boy of craziness as their candidate for the presidency.

From: Trans bathrooms by Kent

Just another non-issue that riles up the political and religious fanatics on the right wing of the Republican Party.

What on earth would the right wing Republicans do if they didn't have things like LGBT issues to stoke the culture wars against the evil Godless liberal Democrats in general, and the America-hating constitution-shredding Kenyan-born usurper in particular? In this case the right wing God crowd has done a wonderful job of casting the LGBT issue in terms of a story about the dangers to children of sexual predators. When you think about it, that doesn't actually make any sense unless you want to paint a picture of transgendered people as being predominantly inclined to sexual predation, in a way that non-transgendered people are not.

That is of course exactly the idea that the right wing radicals want to disseminate with the phony issue. They seek to cast this and every political difference they have with their opponents as a battle of their moral and ethical superiority against the forces of evil and criminality.

It's SO much easier to whip up anger and hatred about non-issues that infuriate the base than have rational objective debates about actual political issues.

From: Coffee shop: a bit political by Kent

JOLUVR said:
Interesting history on the FDR/Truman era. It should be pointed out that extenuating circumstances of World War played a huge role in '44 a time FDR was visibly dying from heart failure and cardiovascular disease, he died of a massive stroke only five months after being reelected.
Then another set of extenuating circumstances in '48 when the Republicans brokered the candidacy of New York Governor Thomas Dewy. Dewy was heavily favored and Truman was considered an oaf and a bit beneath the Presidency by many with his crass commentary and plain spoken approach and frequent use of profanity in public. A sharp contrast to the dapper buttoned down dandy Thomas E Dewy. Nonetheless he said from the outset " I'm going to beat them and I'm going to make them like it ". So he did, it was a serious blow to the Establishment Republicans who backed Dewy. smile


Great post. "Dapper buttoned down dandy" describes the arrogant self-righteous New York Governor and former prosecutor Dewey perfectly. It was one thing to lose to FDR in 1944, but his defeat by Harry Truman, the plain spoken "Man from Missouri" in 1948 was one of the greatest upsets in American political history.

Anyone interested in political OR television history might be interested in this video clip of the 1948 NBC television election coverage. (Probably the very first televised presidential election coverage.) Attempts to get a statement from President Truman at his election night headquarters at the Muehlebach Hotel in Kansas City were by telephone, since in 1948, there was not yet a coaxial cable or microwave connection to permit transmission of a live TV picture between Kansas City and New York.

The most interesting part of this 27 minute clip is probably the last half. Just a little desk in the corner of a studio with a TV camera in front of it and vote totals by chalk on a blackboard. Two of the people at the desk are John Cameron Swayze and Ben Grauer -- famous early TV newsmen. Unable to contact Truman by phone in Kansas City, Ben Grauer, just before signoff, makes a big deal of being able to cut to a film of Truman made during the campaign. Being able to cut to film in the studio was apparently unusual in 1948. At least as a part of live TV news coverage.

This TV election coverage would have only been seen live in the East. Probably New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Washington, etc. There was no live TV into Kansas City at the time, and I think I read that the link into the Midwest between New York and Chicago was not finished until about 1949. I think that the live TV link across the Rockies that finally connected New York and California was not completed until about 1957.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MwePofIu8o

From: Coffee shop: a bit political by Kent

What? No more ugly Hillary pictures to post?

Yes, we get it. Fanatical right wing Republicans no longer consider it to be enough to have superior political views to their opponents, but they must also be ethically and morally superior. The right wingers just love to charge that their opponents are literally criminals.

Judicial Watch is a right wing organization which has been on a crusade against the Clintons for years. In a political system that depends on successful candidates raising big money to be competitive, influence peddling is the prefect mud to throw at an opponent. It can be easily charged in an election campaign, and since it involves a person's MOTIVATIONS and not their ACTIONS, it is essentially impossible for that person to prove actual innocence. It almost never comes to trial of course, since what goes on in a person's mind is very nearly impossible to prove in court. But no problem, the political damage is already done.

It is going to be supremely satisfying to see all the fanatical right wing Hillary hating Republicans weeping bitter tears when Hillary Clinton is sworn in as the 45th President of the United States.

From: Coffee shop: a bit political by Kent

Dman said:
wait, what?


What a great contribution to the discussion! I have seen lots of really ugly and stupid looking pictures of Donald Trump that I could post too.

Unbelievable that the politics of the great republic have degenerated to this. No worse than Donald's "crooked Hillary" rhetoric I guess.

The great American statesmen are turning in their graves. But on the good side, we know that the vulgar narcissistic buffoon running for president will take the Republican party down to an historic electoral disaster.

Page: < prev  of 100   next >