When you're in a gym with open showering facilities, saunas, etc, you see how guys are hung. And some of the best hung guys I see (show-ers instead of growers) are often older guys.
Anyone notice how older guys (60's and 70's) often have amazingly large cocks and awesome low hanging ball sacs? Seems like the really big softies and balls are on the older guys, much more than the young dudes.
Message Boards
Page: of 3 next >
Posted on 2012-12-05 01:51 PM. Last edited by William99 on 2012-12-05 01:53 PM. (3 edits total)
I'm always impressed with six or seven inch softies that swing back and forth when a guy walks through the locker room. Some of these are often sort of fat, even as softies. You just seldom see those big heavy meaty ones.
But it does seem like it's often the older dudes who have them. I saw an awesome package on a guy who must have been in his 70's. Not sure if he could have gotten it up anymore, but it was a great show as it was.
But it does seem like it's often the older dudes who have them. I saw an awesome package on a guy who must have been in his 70's. Not sure if he could have gotten it up anymore, but it was a great show as it was.
Older guys do have heavy hanging equipment. Most of the time uncut and low hangers! Gets me hard thinking of that.
I've often noticed the big heavy equipment that some older guys have. I wonder if one factor might be that the older guys don't have as much sex as the younger ones. So you tend to see the younger guys in a deflated condition after last night's bedroom action. Mine certainly hangs longer if I haven't had sex or masturbated for a while.
Same here, I notice that at the gym too. I wonder why that's the case. I'm not a show-er by any means, definitely a grower here. I'm about 7" when hard. Sometimes, when I'm soft, I'm like 2", especially if its cold. Shrivel up like a damn cherub.
Unfortunately, I found that as I got older, my once heavy equipment has retreated. Used to get comments all the time in restrooms and adult theatre booths about what a show-er I was and my nice low-hangers... Now they prefer to stay close to my body most of the time
Posted on 2012-12-05 03:03 PM. Last edited by Kent on 2012-12-05 03:03 PM. (1 edits total)
@ khungus: Same kind of grower here too man. It's seldom more than two inches long when soft. But about triples in size to 7 inches when aroused. I always admire those big long swingers that you see on guys in the locker room, often on the older dudes.
Posted on 2012-12-05 05:07 PM. Last edited by Nathaniel on 2012-12-05 05:11 PM. (3 edits total)
RandyCumlover said:
Unfortunately, I found that as I got older, my once heavy equipment has retreated. Used to get comments all the time in restrooms and adult theatre booths about what a show-er I was and my nice low-hangers... Now they prefer to stay close to my body most of the time
Unfortunately, I found that as I got older, my once heavy equipment has retreated. Used to get comments all the time in restrooms and adult theatre booths about what a show-er I was and my nice low-hangers... Now they prefer to stay close to my body most of the time
I had the same experience, and was losing some of my size I thought, about the time I was having trouble getting a boner. Now I take Cialis, and not only get boners, I think it's helping a little with the soft size.
I've noticed that some of us older men do have big heavy packages, although I never had more than 4 inches, and an average ball sack.
Posted on 2018-04-16 05:27 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2018-04-16 05:30 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2018-04-16 06:28 PM. Last edited by Earlybird on 2018-04-16 06:33 PM. (5 edits total)
I don't think it's age related. I'm 62. I've always been a grower & my balls have always been very tight.
Soft on a cool morning (~1.5" long x 3.5" in girth).
Usual soft size (~2.5" long x 3.5" in girth).
Soft, just after a hot bath. Longest it ever gets while completely soft (~3.5" long x 3.5" in girth), and the loosest my balls ever get.
For comparison, here it is fully erect (~5.75" long x 4.75" in girth).
Soft on a cool morning (~1.5" long x 3.5" in girth).
Usual soft size (~2.5" long x 3.5" in girth).
Soft, just after a hot bath. Longest it ever gets while completely soft (~3.5" long x 3.5" in girth), and the loosest my balls ever get.
For comparison, here it is fully erect (~5.75" long x 4.75" in girth).
I shower at a local gym once in a while don't see a lot of others, but a few of the older guys are still hung pretty good. At 71 I am 3 to 3 l/2 inches soft and six inches with a hard on. My cock is the same size now as it was years ago.
I do think my balls hang a little lower as I've gotten older.
I do think my balls hang a little lower as I've gotten older.
It amazes me to see men totally limp who are bigger than I am hard. I always wonder how big they are hard.
Check out my porn blog at https://slostroker.bdsmlr.com/ and my writing blog at https://slostroker.wordpress.com or catch me on Skype as SloStroker
Posted on 2018-04-17 12:50 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2018-04-18 11:54 PM. (2 edits total)
Older guys generally have the same range of cock sizes (small, average, and large) as all other guys.
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Fucking troll poisons every thread with the same old, tired bullshit!
Thanks for your comment. It is good for keeping my posts on the front page. I just feel bad that you cannot accept that some people actually have a larger dick than what you have.
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Page: of 3 next >