Posted on 2015-04-10 08:39 PM
IJerkalot said:
love disney and nick babes stroke alot to Peyton List and Allie DeBerry especially. yahoo im wuckinfanker for chat
Dirty pedophile, or an utter troll.
Posted on 2015-04-22 08:26 AM
Unregistered
Good idea. Don't need any underage loving pervs here. Don't ruin the site with their tainted disease!
Posted on 2015-04-22 10:31 AM
Unregistered
I think sometimes us Brits fall foul of these problems as 16 is the big age in our country. Of course this means nothing to the website because it sets it's ownstandards. But it does explain why some of us talk about women in the 16-18 bracket on here not realising we are breaking the rules.
And for clarity I just like looking at their pics. I don't engage in sexual talk about them.
Posted on 2015-07-21 04:22 PM
gwensfootlover
43 posts since 2014-08-02
43 year old heterosexual from UK
Uk_mids_43 said:
I think sometimes us Brits fall foul of these problems as 16 is the big age in our country. Of course this means nothing to the website because it sets it's ownstandards. But it does explain why some of us talk about women in the 16-18 bracket on here not realising we are breaking the rules.
And for clarity I just like looking at their pics. I don't engage in sexual talk about them.
Exactly. But if the thread is about 18 year olds they shouldn't be locked.
Posted on 2015-07-21 04:28 PM
lorel6418
215 posts since 2012-06-22
51 year old heterosexual
Ben said:
I'm making a new policy. Since *EVERY* Disney/Nick thread ends up being a discussion about underaged people, I'm locking every single one of them immediately going forward.
Thank you!
Posted on 2015-07-22 01:41 AM
Rod
3032 posts since 2005-08-13
53 year old bisexual from Dallas, TX
gwensfootlover said:
Exactly. But if the thread is about 18 year olds they shouldn't be locked.
Logical.
Here's the thing, though. As Ben noted in the original post, if the thread specifically references the Disney or Nick properties, almost without fail, someone just has to go there and drifts off to underage subjects. So, Disney/Nick threads will be closed.
Posted on 2015-07-22 01:49 AM
Unregistered
Does that include posts about nick nolte?
Posted on 2015-07-22 12:57 PM. Last edited by Unregistered on 2015-07-22 01:00 PM. (1 edits total)
Unregistered
Although she's legal in the UK right now but for legal reason on this site Ariel Winter is off limits until January. But as soon as she hits 18 in a few months time you know she's gonna be one of the most talked about celebrity babes on here.
Quite a few already post her pics and chat about her on Reddit.
Posted on 2015-07-22 01:37 PM
Rod
3032 posts since 2005-08-13
53 year old bisexual from Dallas, TX
And, when that inevitable flood comes, users will receive the same reminder that the legion of Maisie Williams posters did: sure, she's legal now, but has been in the public eye for years before. So, most pics available of her at that time will still be images of a minor, and thus off limits and subject to our Terms of Service.
Posted on 2016-03-22 09:03 PM
scotstiger28
233 posts since 2015-10-08
36 year old curious from Stirlingshire
Is it okay to still have an obsession with the Disney Princesses/characters then or is that banned too ?
Posted on 2016-03-22 10:02 PM
Unregistered
Great move 100% agree
Posted on 2016-05-16 09:14 PM. Last edited by Unregistered on 2016-05-16 09:30 PM. (6 edits total)
Unregistered
The counterpoint is that all the depraved anal-rape, scat/piss, BDSM, bestiality, and choking porn is fine and dandy. Be aroused by a beautiful 6,569 day old (18 years -1 day) girl however, you will be banned. I understand the situation, and support the ban, but its a shame, and illustrates the crazy, non-sensical, asymmetrical view of sexual arousal prevalent in society.
Posted on 2016-05-16 10:11 PM
Dman
2099 posts since 2015-06-14
70 year old heterosexual from Western US
OnanSr said:
The counterpoint is that all the depraved anal-rape, scat/piss, BDSM, bestiality, and choking porn is fine and dandy. Be aroused by a beautiful 6,569 day old (18 years -1 day) girl however, you will be banned. I understand the situation, and support the ban, but its a shame, and illustrates the crazy, non-sensical, asymmetrical view of sexual arousal prevalent in society.
Why is it a shame?
Master edger, labia licker, nipple tugger and veteran voyeur.
Posted on 2016-05-16 10:14 PM. Last edited by Rod on 2016-05-16 10:14 PM. (1 edits total)
Rod
3032 posts since 2005-08-13
53 year old bisexual from Dallas, TX
OnanSr said:
The counterpoint is that all the depraved anal-rape, scat/piss, BDSM, bestiality, and choking porn is fine and dandy. Be aroused by a beautiful 6,569 day old (18 years -1 day) girl however, you will be banned. I understand the situation, and support the ban, but its a shame, and illustrates the crazy, non-sensical, asymmetrical view of sexual arousal prevalent in society.
In point of fact, bestiality topics/images are in violation of the terms of service, as are those regarding individuals under 18. The other subjects you mention, while some may find distasteful, are not currently violations of the terms of service.
Thanks for your input.
Posted on 2016-10-09 10:45 AM
wabiiwabii
432 posts since 2014-11-04
heterosexual
OnanSr said:
The counterpoint is that all the depraved anal-rape, scat/piss, BDSM, bestiality, and choking porn is fine and dandy. Be aroused by a beautiful 6,569 day old (18 years -1 day) girl however, you will be banned. I understand the situation, and support the ban, but its a shame, and illustrates the crazy, non-sensical, asymmetrical view of sexual arousal prevalent in society.
You didn't consider leap years, though. 6,569 days aren't 18 years minus one day. Just saying.