Sometimes you are not soft, but then you are not rock-hard either. Those are the times you are somewhere inbetween (semi) like these young men.
Message Boards
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-06-23 12:50 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-06-23 12:51 PM. (2 edits total)
Age isn't a deciding factor on boner size.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Young guys: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Older guys: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Young guys: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Older guys: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
GraysAnatomy is the biggest troll here which definitely means he's the biggest cock
Let's wank, suck and rim each other! KiK = CL0NE7
Posted on 2017-06-29 09:17 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-06-29 09:19 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-06-29 09:56 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-06-29 11:02 PM. (2 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-06-30 02:04 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-06-30 02:05 PM. (1 edits total)
Ah, youth. I remember when my boner pointed straight up and slapped my belly-button. Now at 74 years old it just sticks straight out. Boners the way they were meant to be!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-06-30 04:20 PM. Last edited by SexyAuthor on 2017-06-30 04:21 PM. (1 edits total)
oops
Posted on 2017-07-06 04:54 AM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-08-01 03:36 PM. (4 edits total)
Regular guys are so HOT!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
5 cut here, big balls
LTJ
Posted on 2017-07-21 05:57 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-08-01 03:37 PM. (3 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-07-22 01:43 AM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-08-01 03:37 PM. (3 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-07-27 10:28 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-07-27 10:33 PM. (2 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-08-01 01:16 AM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-08-01 03:38 PM. (4 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2017-08-01 03:36 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2017-08-01 03:39 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .