Message Boards
Hot older guys!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
MistressT said:
You guys and your fixation on the size of your penis crack me up. A lot more important to you than to us.
You guys and your fixation on the size of your penis crack me up. A lot more important to you than to us.
True...men are more focused on size than women. But as a woman, given the same man, one with a 5" cock and on with a 7" cock....which would you choose everything else being the same?
A big cock doesn't make a bad man good, but it can make a good man better.
Check out my porn blog at https://slostroker.bdsmlr.com/ and my writing blog at https://slostroker.wordpress.com or catch me on Skype as SloStroker
I love it when regular guys have boners!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Those all look huge to me! lol
Regular guys, soft or hard, are so hot!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
While I enjoy these pictures as much as the next person, we know these are not "Average sized" cocks. 
Orgasms are AMAZING!!!
If all these guys are "average", where's the 12 and 14 inch cocks?
Gunstar69
2056 posts since 2011-06-13
73 year old bisexual male from S/E Michigan outside of Detroit
2056 posts since 2011-06-13
73 year old bisexual male from S/E Michigan outside of Detroit
GraysAnatomy said:
I love it when regular guys have boners!
Damn fine looking cocks. Always liked looking at cocks sticking out of a pair of pants.I love it when regular guys have boners!
Just regular guys in black and white!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Regular guys who like to get naked and hard outside!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Unregistered 
I'm average at around 6 inches. But I'm envious when I see someone who is hung. Like it would make a difference.
soooo, i'm average sized (5.5-6.5" depending on the 'motivation'!) and have been all my life. feels good when i JO, never had problems getting laid since i was 14 and when mrsbiker wants something 'extra' we have a 10" extension. don't think i need any more cock!
"...occupational hazard is, occupation's just not around..."
Horny guys with rock-hard boners! So HOT!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
After looking at all these regular guys, I still think my 7" X 6" boner is on the small side of average.
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
There is something so HOT about seeing regular guys with their soft limp dicks hanging down!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .