"To deter boys . . ." ? I don't think so. Or, it certianly never worked, with me or with other circumcised guys I know. We all j/o a lot without any difficulty. It seems to me, the ancients wanted guys cut because a cut dick looks more like an uncut one with the foreskin pulled back and ready to fuck - in other words, I think it encourages guys to use their dicks, not discourages them.

From the circumcision wikipedia page: "Circumcision did not become a common medical procedure in the Anglophone world until the late 19th century.[96] At that time, British and American doctors began recommending it primarily as a deterrent to masturbation.[96][97] Prior to the 20th century, masturbation was believed to be the cause of a wide range of physical and mental illnesses including epilepsy, paralysis, impotence, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, feeblemindedness, and insanity.[98][99] In 1855, motivated in part by an interest in promoting circumcision to reduce masturbation, English physician Jonathan Hutchinson published his findings that Jews had a lower prevalence of certain venereal diseases."

Dr John Kellog (yes, the Cornflakes guy) pushed it heavily as a deterrent to masturbation, writing:

"A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering anaesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment."

Those crazy puritanical victorians!

Have had it all 3 ways, born uncut, cut at 36, with much stretching and hard stroking about 70% back to normal. My grand mother taught my mom to fully retract male babies foreskins and wash daily as a mandatory part of old country hygiene and I'm damn greatfull she did. At the age of 5 I was replicating the feelings of being skinned back and washed and as a dick will do it got hard and it loved being played with at every opportunity. When I was in my mid thirties I got the stupid idea that getting cut would increase the friction when having sex, but the loose cut still bunched up behind the head and I would have been better off just taping back the skin to see it would have been better. Yes it stayed retracted when hard it did not improve my sensations or even the hygiene. The down side of the cut job is that now I have had to battle a scar ring that is tighter now because my penis is thicker now than 10 years ago. I have worked through this with cortisone cream, but if your not cut and don't have a medical reason to do it, explore other options. There is a lot of pleasure that a loose long foreskin can provide and I would much rather have never had it cut.

I hope this young man is not in the hospital for a circumcision!
It is probably for a vasectomy. But what a gorgeous THICK cock!
I would love to see how it looks when he is horny and rock-hard!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I feel extremely fortunate that being born in the 50's, even though my father was circumcised, my parents questioned the need for circumcision and the doctor told them he did not circumcise his son and saw no medical or hygienic reason for it. So I have enjoyed all the benefits of having a foreskin and all the females I have been with thoroughly enjoyed it as well. In fact many who were experiencing a foreskin for the first time said they could feel my foreskin sliding, or rolling, back and forth inside them and it added greatly to the overall pleasure!!!

Am circumcised and wish I wasn't. I've always liked the look of circumcised but I understand that uncircumcised keeps the head from getting calloused and so uncircumcised heads are more sensitive.

Well said, guys!

I love my circumcised cock. I don't care if yours is or not. I will be happy to jerk or suck you either way lol.