Message Boards
This shot, with the apparently large uncut cock with the partially exposed head towards the top left of the picture, was taken close using a wide-angle lens. That alters the perspective and makes the cock look huge compared to things further away from the camera, for example the jeans.
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2015-09-26 03:46 AM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-09-26 03:50 AM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
anyone for cam play?
Posted on 2015-10-02 11:29 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-10-02 11:37 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2015-11-05 07:21 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-11-05 07:22 PM. (2 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2015-12-14 08:09 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-12-14 08:10 PM. (1 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2015-12-15 02:40 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-12-15 02:47 PM. (3 edits total)
hand_on_cock said:
Well I do like to show my cock off, so here's some I took especially for this post...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Well I do like to show my cock off, so here's some I took especially for this post...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Terrific looking THICK cock and two great pictures, dude! Here are some more to admire. Remember, blue-jeans are HOT but the prize is that which is within!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2015-12-19 03:02 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-12-19 03:04 PM. (2 edits total)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Awesome jeans, awesome cocks! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Posted on 2015-12-26 08:35 PM. Last edited by GraysAnatomy on 2015-12-26 08:37 PM. (2 edits total)
Hung guys in bluejeans!
No tiny 5.5" (average sized?) cocks here either. No way can 5.5" be average!
No tiny 5.5" (average sized?) cocks here either. No way can 5.5" be average!
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
The photo with cum running down onto his balls does it for me!!!!!!
Nothing hotter than two husbands together, naked, pleasing themselves and each other