Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Message Boards
I agree. I love cocks but I dont really want to hug and kiss or have a relationship with a guy. Though I suppose it could happen if I got together with someone and a relationship developed. But not for now.
chazzy_244 j/o lover
xkcd said:
Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Well said!
personally im straight but i do have some gay fantasies but i dont consider myself gay or bi because i dont think of a man in the same way i would a woman.
i think it just has something to do with how horny guys are, i dont really find anything on a man "attractive" or beautiful like i do a woman, but theres just this sexually perverse side to me that kinda gets off to the idea.
i think alot of guys feel that way
i think it just has something to do with how horny guys are, i dont really find anything on a man "attractive" or beautiful like i do a woman, but theres just this sexually perverse side to me that kinda gets off to the idea.
i think alot of guys feel that way
xkcd said:
Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Nonsense. Nothing to do with "love" or "marriage" but everything to do with SEXUAL DESIRE/ATTRACTION.
If a man has impulses/fantasies to engage in any sort of sexual activity with ANOTHER MAN, by definition he's either bi or gay.
Keep it healthy, keep it hard.
Unregistered 
All this is really glossing over the issue. Semantics don't actually help the situation. The only really sensible response has been by really_07.
The issue isn't about a label for sexuality. Why is that ever important? All that is, is language! Why are we arguing about the definition of language? look it up in a dictionary, if you don't like the word, use a different one!
The real issue is the same when any two people have sex. What are the health, emotional and moral implications to each of you, can you deal with them and do they affect anyone else? Those are the only issues that matter. Petty squabbling over abstract definitions of any potential interaction are irrelevant.
The issue isn't about a label for sexuality. Why is that ever important? All that is, is language! Why are we arguing about the definition of language? look it up in a dictionary, if you don't like the word, use a different one!
The real issue is the same when any two people have sex. What are the health, emotional and moral implications to each of you, can you deal with them and do they affect anyone else? Those are the only issues that matter. Petty squabbling over abstract definitions of any potential interaction are irrelevant.
Hi,there's nothing abstract about a definition. The point I am making is one of intelectual honesty.
What some guys appear to be saying is: Have all kinds of sexual activity, either real or imagined, with another man but as long as you don't kiss him you're 'straight.'
Reminds me of President Clinton and his definition of "sexual relationships" - blow-jobs and jack offs are not 'sexual'? He pulled the same stunt regarding smoking pot - he didn't inhale (so he claimed) so ergo - he hadn't smoked pot.
Come on - this does look like a very North American problem.
What some guys appear to be saying is: Have all kinds of sexual activity, either real or imagined, with another man but as long as you don't kiss him you're 'straight.'
Reminds me of President Clinton and his definition of "sexual relationships" - blow-jobs and jack offs are not 'sexual'? He pulled the same stunt regarding smoking pot - he didn't inhale (so he claimed) so ergo - he hadn't smoked pot.
Come on - this does look like a very North American problem.
Keep it healthy, keep it hard.
Unregistered
Isn't everything a North American problem? I've encountered that mentality before - it's not sex if it's not penetration. Well if that was the case, child molesters have an easy ride :S
That line of thinking is just a cop-out for guys to get their end off while claiming the girl is still a virgin.
I guess my point is: the name you give to the act is less important than the act itself. However - in my book, if there's physical contact with erect genitalia - that's sex. But then... again... that's definition of language!
That line of thinking is just a cop-out for guys to get their end off while claiming the girl is still a virgin.
I guess my point is: the name you give to the act is less important than the act itself. However - in my book, if there's physical contact with erect genitalia - that's sex. But then... again... that's definition of language!
rockhard22 said:
Isn't everything a North American problem? I've encountered that mentality before - it's not sex if it's not penetration. Well if that was the case, child molesters have an easy ride :S
That line of thinking is just a cop-out for guys to get their end off while claiming the girl is still a virgin.
I guess my point is: the name you give to the act is less important than the act itself. However - in my book, if there's physical contact with erect genitalia - that's sex. But then... again... that's definition of language!
Isn't everything a North American problem? I've encountered that mentality before - it's not sex if it's not penetration. Well if that was the case, child molesters have an easy ride :S
That line of thinking is just a cop-out for guys to get their end off while claiming the girl is still a virgin.
I guess my point is: the name you give to the act is less important than the act itself. However - in my book, if there's physical contact with erect genitalia - that's sex. But then... again... that's definition of language!
what would Clinton say?
feels good ? do it and who cares
id say it makes you bi unless your not interested in girls anymore, inwich case it would make you gay
aussie_18 said:
hey this is a question for the straight guys out there. what do you guys think about having sex with a guy as in being the top. do you think it makes you gay or is it ok if you havent had sex with a girl for a while. just want to know your opinions?
hey this is a question for the straight guys out there. what do you guys think about having sex with a guy as in being the top. do you think it makes you gay or is it ok if you havent had sex with a girl for a while. just want to know your opinions?
In my opinoin, if two guys are engaging in sexual activity together where the intent is to obtain pleasure from stimulation (mental or physical) from the other guy, or the result is pleasure from that guy, its homosexual behavior. I don't think it 'makes' a person gay. They either identify themselves as homosexual and continue to pursue homosexual behavior/have homoerotic thoughts, or they don't.
Personally, I don't get excited by other guys. It's just the way I'm wired. In a MFM situation my pleasure comes from pleasing the woman, but there is no desire for bisexual contact meant to arouse or be aroused by the other man. Everyone's definitions and limits are different, but thats my $0.02
xkcd said:
Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Sexual orientation means which sex you're attracted to as a "mating" partner.
If the thought of loving another man and marrying him doesn't seem attractive to you then you're not gay.
Marriage is for straights. Being attracted to other men physically and emotionally is what "makes you gay" if thats the label you choose to use.
It does me good like I know it should.
Gay or bi.
I do not consider myself gay as I like to have sex with women. I really get aroused by cocks and balls--mine and others'--but I am not at all interested in any other part of a guy's body. I have had sex with 148 women and 11 men. I call myself a below-the-belt bisexual. I like to be suck and be fucked. I have never kissed a guy and I never will. Anyone wanna pigeonhole my sexuality? It's a complex world, and you will go crazy if you try to categorize it in absolute terms.
Do you crave big balls?