. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. 
. 
Message Boards
Posing outdoors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
So, is there any real reason why this thread shouldn't be retitled, "Vintage and Retro Gay porn" now, to more accurately reflect the content?
Sabonis7 said:
So, is there any real reason why this thread shouldn't be retitled, "Vintage and Retro Gay porn" now, to more accurately reflect the content?
So, is there any real reason why this thread shouldn't be retitled, "Vintage and Retro Gay porn" now, to more accurately reflect the content?
Even better call it: Grays Anatomy personal fetish & picture bomb thread. I love vintage porn, and don't mind seeing a bit of cock, but pages upon pages of well hung studs are too much and the same old stuff as well.
If God created anything better than wanking - he kept it to himself.
Ok,you don't have to look.I know but it's his thing!
I posted 13 times in 64 days. That is roughly once every fifth day. Instead of just complaining about what is posted, if you all would post some retro or vintage pictures you like, maybe I could find some similar to them and post more in line with what you like. Bottom line is, constructive suggestions work better than destructive criticism.
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Ok,as I've said,you do what you want.I agree,no problem.good luck.
Enjoy!
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Who remembers swimming nude at the WMCA
Guy tiny cocked addicted chronic Wanker
55wanker said:
Who remembers swimming nude at the WMCA
Who remembers swimming nude at the WMCA
I remember. I learned to swim at the Y.
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
People had sex, even before color photography was invented.
. 
. 
. . . . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
Sex in a public park.
. . . . . . . . . . Surely no one is so naive they really believe a 5.2 inch erection is considered average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I see more 5.2 inch flaccid cocks than I do of little 5.2 inch erections. . . . . . . . . . .
[quote=macbolen][/quote]
Boy, what a wank, thanx
Boy, what a wank, thanx
Ah mammaries would be more accurate.
All these pics remind me of when we found my bud's dads porn stash. Ah memories.
[img]http://https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=2pk8%2fCr4&id=15C7E4C1B50164ACC2C784F66F3DB17709773D82&thid=OIP.2pk8_Cr4Hx28LD6mezaWRwHaKg&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2f4.bp.blogspot.com%2f-gtDwailUd5c%2fUXktXBystZI%2fAAAAAAAAMic%2f9VDKbciuW7U%2fs1600%2fp847_1000.jpg&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fRda993cfc2af81f1dbc2c3ea67b369647%3frik%3dgj13CXexPW%252f2hA%26pid%3dImgRaw&exph=752&expw=530&q=Beautiful+Nudes+Vintage&simid=608014193506523440&ck=009BC56A770C14581457D8D1D005C13E&selectedIndex=2&FORM=IRPRST[/img]
GraysAnatomy said:
Sex in a public park in the 1950s.
Sex in a public park in the 1950s.
Just because it's in black and white doesn't mean it's from the 1950s.