| From: Women wearing strapon cocks by Linda luvmycock001 said: always wondered. is there something that rubs a women's clit when she has a strapon? anybody know? There are many designs of strapons and strapon harnesses. The one we generally use has a soft pad behind the ring that secures the flared base of the dildo. When you thrust forward while pegging your partner, the backing pad exerts general pressure on the vulva, but nothing that directly rubs the clitoris. I also have one that doesn't have a pad behind the ring, but it doesn't really allow the dildo to effectively rub the clit either (and doesn't mount the dildo as securely.) There are also harness designs that can be used with double ended dildos, and some that have a pouch on the inside to hold a bullet vibrator that's positioned on or near the clitoris. I've never tried one of those. For heterosexual use, I'd say that strapons are more about arousing your partner when you peg him, or watch him suck cock, than getting any arousal yourself from clitoral stimulation.   |
| From: Women wearing strapon cocks by Linda MilfsRhot said: Here she is again with her lovely cock.  Very hot! On your Knees! Suck it! An occasional stroke of the whip to keep him hot and horny. |
| From: Girlfriends and Contraception by Linda Nathaniel said: there was controversy for a while as Bible-thumping preachers and opportunistic politicians denounced the immorality of unmarried women who were obviously avoiding pregnancy as they engaged in recreational sex. If this Mad Men TV show clip is accurate, unmarried women who asked for the new contraceptive pill faced hostility by doctors. In this clip, the jerk with a cigarette in his hand felt that access to contraception by unmarried women was a slippery slope into sexual depravity and prostitution. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1bPoSEii2M |
| From: First time you watched a man masturbate for you? by Linda Age 16 after making out with high school boyfriend. I saw his pants had a big bulge and a wet spot. I asked him to show it to me and he unzipped his pants and pushed down his shorts. Then he did what I knew boys did. Impressive to see. |
| From: Fleshlight Question by Linda Have you looked at the website? |
| From: most perverted thing you've ever done? by Linda Tyler01 said: Putting on women's underwear. Padding the bra cups. When my man does this, it's a turnon to tell him I know how much he likes his black lace bra, and that no one will ever know about it except him and me. He looks good in a garter belt too. |
| From: Wife is wearing the boots! by Linda RexM said: I can't wait to see her in those boots again. Nice. About how often does she wear the boots. |
| From: Wife is wearing the boots! by Linda "Pavlovian!" |
| From: Where has the Jackinchat I used to know gone? by Linda phjacker said: Not arguing either side of this one (hence I left the quotes anonymous), but makes me think: As a fantasy, surely this is very common? Don't many people like to enjoy that fantasy sometimes, the man protects or steps in and rescues the woman? So if someone comments on that sort of theme is that also going to offend people? First of all, I must reiterate that I have personal zero tolerance for actual male attitudes which presuppose that women are weaker creatures who must depend on stronger dominant males for protection and support. Men (especially older men) commonly have this dominant protective attitude, and I find it despicable. That said, I'm not sure what you actually mean by a "fantasy" scenario in which this happens. I'm having trouble imagining where or how a couple would act this out. In the course of an actual marriage some way? Maybe in some domination/submission role play as a part of love making? Anyway, as a matter of principle, I'm for consenting adults doing whatever they both want to do that's legal and doesn't hurt others. So if acting out the fantasy of a big strong dominant male and a weak needy female works for you, then go for it. As long as it's just play acting, and everyone knows that it's just play acting. As for "commenting" on it. Again, I'm not sure where or how the commentary takes place. But as a matter of principle, I'm for people talking about whatever they want to talk about. And I don't much care whether others are offended by it or not. Who cares?....as long as others who may be offended get to respond with their own opinions. As for the subject of this thread, we had people who seemed to be serious about male protectionism, and women being weak and needy, and seem quite prepared to want to mandate what topics (that are usually considered normal and proper in sexual fantasy) can be discussed and what words can be used to discuss them. All for the avowed purpose of not offending weak sensitive women. Men who have such attitudes are arrogant jerks in my humble opinion. |
| From: Where has the Jackinchat I used to know gone? by Linda MrGiles said: Linda, based on your comments we should be cancelling all laws pertaining to rape, sexual assault, not to mention any to do with discrimination in the workplace, as all women are not in need of such protection. Bet you'd be quick to scream about that. The innate instinct of men is to protect women, not because of any sense of inferiority, but simply as a biological need to protect those who bear their children. In simple terms, everyone is an equal human being, and should be able to express their views and opinions, but they also need to accept that certain views are not acceptable to others and it is at least a common courtesy to try and check first if the people hearing or reading those views are willing to see or hear them. It is this arrogant attitude of certain people, that its ok to say what they like, but when someone else does it its wrong, that is the real problem, not the views themselves. What a marvelous job you do of throwing up irrelevant straw man arguments to justify your male protective sexism. The subject here is sexual fantasy topics. But you throw up ridiculous counter-arguments involving criminal laws in our society about rape, sexual assault, and workplace discrimination. Do you really expect us not to notice that you're equating such issues with sexual topic rules on an adult website? These laws involve real criminality in the real world which are applied equally by government to both genders in a totally gender-neutral way. But you so cleverly apply a little intellectual sleight-of-hand in a straw man argument that transforms that fact into a justification for female protection from certain types of sexual fantasy on a website. Then you mount a sort of free speech appeal for your right to express views and opinions on what is and is not acceptable to others on this website. What on earth do you think that you and Coffeenporn and others have in fact been doing on this thread? But as soon as I and others push back with our own opposing opinions on the subject, you seem to feel aggrieved about it. Of course we agree that there are limits that must be observed. One such limit that absolutely no one disagrees with is the zero tolerance policy on underage content. The mods on this website have been resolutely steadfast in enforcing that rule. But then you take advantage of that in advancing your female protective sexism by time and again referring not to females generally, but by references to a person's DAUGHTER, or an UNDERAGE female celebrity. Sorry, we adult consenting females who you males seek so earnestly to "protect" have once again noticed your intellectual sleight-of-hand. You seem to remain totally tone deaf on the actual gender equality issue as you couch you argument in....and let me quote you word for word: "The innate instinct of men...to protect women, not because of any sense of inferiority, but simply as a biological need to protect those who bear their children." Oh my Lord! Now you want us to believe that this is all about protecting home and hearth and biological offspring. If there was any more damning indictment of centuries-old male protective chauvinistic attitudes toward women, I've not heard it. What you call your "innate instinct" of men to protect women is the very definition of male dominant sexism. That it once existed as the norm of our society and culture is beyond question, but that its intellectual shelf life is long past the expiration date is I think equally not in serious dispute; however much you seem not to have noticed. Once again let me plead with you to try to separate your chauvinistic male protectionism toward women from what you believe about commonly accepted topics for sexual fantasy on an adult website. Please do try to separate in your mind sexual fantasy from real world criminality, and just decide that you'll look at what floats your boat and just be tolerant of what doesn't. |
| From: Where has the Jackinchat I used to know gone? by Linda coffeenporn said: Linda, I'm not saying women are the weaker sex. I don't find it necessary to call them degrading names and lately that's trend here and in the chat rooms. There seems to a theme that runs in the rooms. At one point it was cuckolding, then she-males, now it's degrading names (my personal dislike) but that seems to gotten a lot more responses. It's silly sometimes because guys will call cartoon characters a "slut" or "whore" because they've been calling real women these names for so long. Your comments over and over conflate the issues of underage content with behavior toward adult females. You make repeated references to UNDERAGE females. Obviously no one is defending underage content, but I see no sign that you have the slightest understanding of why women will see your protective male attitude toward ADULT women to be sexist and offensive. (You even bring up the bizarre comment about female cartoon characters to emphasize that your concern is indeed with protection of adult females.) I don't for a moment believe that some sort of similar offense against men would evoke the same protective impulse from you. This is patently sexist, and adult women do not need your protection. Honest! And BTW, your comments were certainly more than simply the expression of an opinion. You said: "I'm glad the Admins are cracking down on the rule breakers, hopefully they can make this place great again." This clearly implies that you are talking about more than the issue of underage content, because the Admins have always vigorously enforced the underage content rules. I can only conclude that you are talking about your female protection program. And BTW, dirty talk and name calling is a staple of sexual fantasy. Some people of BOTH genders are aroused by that. It seems that you're offended by cuckolding and shemales too. Both very popular topics of sexual fantasy, but obviously among the countless sexual issues that offend you. I invite you to read what you want on here, and just ignore the rest. And quit calling on the moderators to enforce your personal likes and dislikes with rules that apply to everyone. |
| From: Where has the Jackinchat I used to know gone? by Linda Langhorn said: The idea that lots of women are not here at a jackoff site because we're not sufficiently respectful of them is a freekin joke. The fact is that in its male dominant, female protective condescension, that's pure sexism of the worst kind. It's not surprising that the old guys here have this ancient sexist male protective view of women, while the young guys consider this to be pure political correctness run amok. I've been around here for several years, but seldom post. I do wish to comment about the fact that it took so long for this discussion to get to what I consider to be the central point as expressed above. However well intentioned it might have been, Coffeenporn's post, and the female protection squad who jumped on his bandwagon are the worst kind of sexism and bias against women. Let me point out to you men that modern women don't need your protection from all those vile bad words, and certainly don't want your condescending male superior attitude. Your obvious and offensive view of women as being weak and needy belongs somewhere back in the early 20th century, if not the 19th. What exactly is it about gender equality that you fail to understand? Equal means equal, and you can take all your protective male concern for female sensitivities and shove it. |
| From: what is your kinky fetish? by Linda Interesting thread! Seems that many men have a fetish for women's underwear. Anybody ever been "brassiered" as a feminine domination technique? Putting a man in a bra, or showing him the power of the panty, is a great technique for feminine domination. |
| From: Secretly submissive husband by Linda My hubby and I are about 50-50 in taking the sexual lead. When he initiates the sex, he’s in total control. He picks the positions and sets the pace. It can be a little rough, which I like. He may slap my butt if I’m not quite in the position he wants. He may spank me. But when I initiate the sex, I call the shots. And if I’m occasionally in a serious domination mood, I may put him in restraints and do some face sitting. Then he becomes very sub and femme, and I may even put some sissy underwear on him. He looks great in a bra and panties. This works for us and has a role playing aspect to it. If a person is just not inclined in one direction or another, I’m not sure how you can get them to change, beyond just talking to them about your desires. |
| From: Closed Thread by Linda Thank you Rod for the thoughtful response to my postings. I do appreciate your attention to this. Let me be clear that I certainly noted the dual reference in Ben’s closing comment. Namely the fact that the hot linked pictures didn’t work, but then his word “also” followed by a clear comment that can only be interpreted as referring to the nature of the post itself....with his use of the terms “kinds of posts” and “not appropriate.” Your spin on this is ingenious but unconvincing. In particular, the sticky post you referenced does not at all refer to the specific “kind of post” which Ben closed. Then, your explanation for the unequal application of whatever principle is actually being applied is that....oh well....there are just too many posts in the male forum to always catch this kind of thing. This is seriously your justification for unequal treatment of men and women? Really? Then would it be too much to ask you to start moderating the two forums with the same degree of sloppiness and inattention? That would perhaps impose a rough form of gender equality, which I’m now convinced you don’t in fact personally believe in. Personal attitudes which you seem intent on imposing on the board by ad hoc means of this sort. The boys run the board, but they’ll allow the ladies to participate on male terms. |
JackinChat forums are temporarily in read-only mode. Will be back soon!
Member Login
The ability to log in is temporarily unavailable
Sponsored Links
Search Posts
Very sexy thread!Page: of 7 next >